Doesn't This Silence the Bulls-Are-Better-Without-Derrick-Rose Dummies?


None of the Bulls’ beat writers will do the obvious: Why was Joakim Noah gimping around in the fourth quarter after slicing his ankle in half?

This isn’t about winning a now meaningless series against the Philadelphia 76ers, it’s the long-term picture. Joakim Noah is your second most valuable trade asset and an actual strength on a team of specialists.

I was in the Tom-Thibodeau-isn’t-at-fault-for-Derrick-Rose’s-ACL-tear camp, but this? How does one begin to explain him being back in the game, when his replacement is often better than he is on the defensive end of the game?

I’m more offended that the team’s doctors medically cleared him to go back in the game. If you’re Thibodeau—in the heat of the battle—shouldn’t be able to count on those around you to make these decisions?

Oh yeah, the Bulls lost Sunday because they didn’t have Derrick Rose and Joakim Noah in what is now becoming one of the most pitiful NBA stories I can remember. This isn’t a team melting under pressure, it’s a team that came apart by, well, bad luck.

Can we put an end to the “I like C.J. Watson” stupidity and the “the Bulls play better without Derrick 
Rose?” Both theories have been shared gratuitously since Derrick went down with his awful injury and it’s maddening—if not, fucking infuriating to anyone who has seriously consumed Bulls basketball since Rose joined the team.

Bad opinions aren’t new, but I sincerely believe people want to differentiate themselves when these moments of sporting crises occur. I was at the fore of the Chicago Bears are ruined with Caleb Hanie, and yet, there was this uncharted uptick in Bears optimism because HE WAS IN  THE LINEUP!

“I like this kid, he’s got moxie.”

“I think he’ll give them a push.”

“Did you see him in the NFC Championship game—they nearly won!”

Never mind he completed like 11 passes, three of them to the Packers for seven points. I don’t think people want to deal with the hurt and the disappointment with an injury this severe. All that time—especially in basketball—we spent watching this silly game is for naught because Johnny Knox slipped out of his break and Derrick Rose was attacking when shouldn’t have been.

The comparisons are eerie: Both Cutler and Rose (albeit, a much more accomplished player) are on teams with very little firepower, asked to do the impossible on a consistent basis and are under incredible pressure week-to-week but are better appreciated when they aren’t in the lineup.

I didn’t think I had the nerve to watch the rest of the games without Rose, but I have and it’s exactly what a team would look like without one of the best players in the league. There are no surprises here. Superstars amount to championships. It’s a safe bet.

I know we all like the idea of the little engine that could, but these are professional sports. There are no charity stories. We don’t need to fight the obvious: the Chicago Bulls are entirely dependent and designed around one of the most dynamic point guards I’ve ever seen.

That’s all.

This season has been difficult to enjoy in spite of winning. We’ve worried that we can’t handle the Heat, but it was really a test of whether we would be  blessed enough to win the regular season again without expending all of our assets.

When Derrick Rose went down, the season went with it.

At this point, it’s a matter of next season and beyond.

Contact Mike Mitchell at michaelkennethmitchell@gmail.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment